RESOURCE: Evidence-Based Practices for Asynchronous Materials

Summary

Use the following prioritized guidelines based on strategies from published instructional design and educational technology literature to identify opportunities to optimize your course’s online asynchronous materials. There are additional ways to improve your materials, however, these are the areas of focus for the college during the 2023-2024 school year. Please strive for “meets college expectations” on the following document for each of the criteria.

Body

Evidence-based practices for asynchronous materials

Criterion Opportunity for improvement Meets college expectations Evidence-based practice
Recorded content is brief Lecture is greater than 30 minutes Lecture is between 10 and 30 minutes Lecture is 10 minutes or less
Recorded content is meaningfully chunked

Lecture material is not meaningfully chunked and attempts to cover multiple learning objectives in one single recording.

Lecture material contains some divisions/chunks but not in a meaningful way.

Lecture content is broken down into discrete units of learning. For example, if your content has 3 learning outcomes, you might have five videos—one for an introduction, three for the learning outcomes, and one for the conclusion.

Recorded content contains effective use of visuals and text

Complex backgrounds are used which are not needed.

Slides contain “walls of text” and/or poor use of white space.

Inconsistent use of fonts on slides.

Signaling is not employed to highlight important information

Amount of text is acceptable but could be reduced and replaced with illustrations, animations, or schematics.

Audio overlays may help engage the learner in both audio and visual channels while interacting with content.

Extraneous elements are reduced but still observable.

Lecture includes more illustrations, animations, or schematics than face-to-face lectures as this maximizes learning through engaging both visual and audio processing of information.

No complex backgrounds are used in slides.

Effective use of whitespace and consistent fonts are applied.

Signaling is employed to highlight important information. 

Recorded content has high quality audio

Built in microphone is used to record audio and/or different microphones are used throughout recorded content (i.e., part of content was recorded at a different date with a different set up)

Audio is of mixed quality—some hissing, crackling, or humming may be present upon listening through headphones.

Audio of uniform quality. If video was created in multiple parts, the same audio source was used. Audio sounds clear with no hissing, crackling, or humming upon review with headphones.

Tip: The LDM team has high quality microphones to check out to record your content. Please reach out to cop-design@osu.edu to request one.

 

Multimedia learning materials are high quality 

Images/diagrams are very pixelated, poor contrast, etc. likely due to images of text being used.

Images/diagrams of mixed quality. Improvements can be made in creating elements with a uniform quality/resolution.

Images/diagrams used have high resolution (i.e., are not pixelated) and are of uniform quality. 

Recommended file type for images (PNGs).

References

Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125

Choe, R.C., Scuric, Z., Eshkol, E., Cruser, S., Arndt, A., Cox, R., Toma, S.P., Shapiro, C., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Barnes, G., & Crosbie, R.H. (2019). Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in asynchronous online lecture videos. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 18:ar55, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-08-0171 

Darby, Flower (2019). Small Teaching Online: Applying the Science of Learning in Online Classes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Di Paolo, T., Wakefield, J. S., Mills, L. A., & Baker, L. (2017). Lights, Camera, Action: Facilitating the Design and Production of Effective Instructional Videos. TechTrends, 61(5), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0206-0

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). What works and doesn’t work with instructional video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89(June), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.015

Mayer, R.E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Education Tech Research and Dev, 68, 837-852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6

Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–769. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760

Details

Details

Article ID: 156867
Created
Fri 2/2/24 2:28 PM
Modified
Fri 2/2/24 3:48 PM